People v. Eisman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Eisman

215 A.D. 835, 213 N.Y.S. 877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 A.D. 835 (People v. Eisman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Eisman, 215 A.D. 835, 213 N.Y.S. 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions, borough of Brooklyn, reversed on the law and the facts, information dismissed and defendant discharged. We agree with Justice Salmon, who dissented from the conviction, that on the evidence here the police officers had no right to arrest the defendant without a warrant. (People v. Hochstim, 36 Misc. 562; Civil Rights Law, § S.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions, borough of Brooklyn, reversed on the law and the facts, information dismissed and defendant discharged. We agree with Justice Salmon, who dissented from the conviction, that on the evidence here the police officers had no right to arrest the defendant without a warrant. (People v. Hochstim, 36 Misc. 562; Civil Rights Law, § S.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D. 835, 213 N.Y.S. 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-eisman-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack