People v. Eilersficken

California Supreme Court

People v. Eilersficken

172 Cal. 815

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 24, 1916

DocketCrim. No. 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 172 Cal. 815 (People v. Eilersficken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Eilersficken, 172 Cal. 815 (Cal. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

MELVIN, J.

The questions involved in the appeals herein from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial are the same as those which arose in the appeals in People v. Jordan, Crim. 1973 (opinion filed March 24,1916), ante, p. 391, and upon the authority of that case the judgment and order are affirmed.

Henshaw, J., Sloss, J., Shaw, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MELVIN, J.

The questions involved in the appeals herein from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial are the same as those which arose in the appeals in People v. Jordan, Crim. 1973 (opinion filed March 24,1916), ante, p. 391, and upon the authority of that case the judgment and order are affirmed.

Henshaw, J., Sloss, J., Shaw, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 Cal. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-eilersficken-cal-1916.