People v. Egnasko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Egnasko

287 A.D.2d 355, 731 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9658

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 287 A.D.2d 355 (People v. Egnasko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Egnasko, 287 A.D.2d 355, 731 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Adlerberg, J.), rendered May 5, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of scheme to defraud in the first degree, 13 counts of grand larceny in the second degree, 28 counts of grand larceny in the third degree, four counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and three counts of petit larceny, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 4 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714). The existing record demonstrates that defendant received an advantageous plea and nothing therein casts doubt on the effectiveness of counsel (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Adlerberg, J.), rendered May 5, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of scheme to defraud in the first degree, 13 counts of grand larceny in the second degree, 28 counts of grand larceny in the third degree, four counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and three counts of petit larceny, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 4 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714). The existing record demonstrates that defendant received an advantageous plea and nothing therein casts doubt on the effectiveness of counsel (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.D.2d 355, 731 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-egnasko-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack