People v. Egbunike
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Camacho, J.), rendered November 15, 2013, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his guilty plea was not knowing because the County Court failed to advise him that his conviction might eventually result in his being deported. The record of the plea proceeding belies the defendant’s contention. Specifically, it shows that the court made the defendant fully aware of the possibility of deportation, and that he chose to plead guilty anyway. Thus, his contention that his guilty plea was not knowingly entered is without merit (see People v Martial, 125 AD3d 688, 689 [2015]; People v Taveras, 123 AD3d 745 [2014]; People v DiPietro, 115 AD3d 977, 977 [2014]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
133 A.D.3d 777 (People v. Egbunike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.