People v. Efferson

2025 NY Slip Op 02794
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 7, 2025
Docket2024-06591
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 02794 (People v. Efferson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Efferson, 2025 NY Slip Op 02794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Efferson (2025 NY Slip Op 02794)
People v Efferson
2025 NY Slip Op 02794
Decided on May 7, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
LOURDES M. VENTURA
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

2024-06591

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Dominique N. Efferson, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 70119/24)


Alex Smith, Middletown, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Cynthia Dolan and Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Richard J. Guertin, J.), rendered May 29, 2024, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's contention that his sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is precluded by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Florio, 179 AD3d 834, 835; People v Rodriguez, 82 AD3d 794, 795), as is his contention that this Court should exercise its interest of justice jurisdiction to reduce the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).

CONNOLLY, J.P., MILLER, VENTURA and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Florio
2020 NY Slip Op 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Rodriguez
82 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 02794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-efferson-nyappdiv-2025.