People v. Edwards

19 A.D.3d 170, 798 N.Y.S.2d 374
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[171]*171Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), rendered January 10, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly exercised its discretion in imposing reasonable limits on defendant’s cross-examination of police witnesses, and defendant was not deprived of his right to confront witnesses and present a defense (see Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 678-679 [1986]). Defendant received a full opportunity to impeach the witnesses and to attack the credibility and reliability of the undercover officer’s account of his conversation with defendant. The relevance of the precluded inquiries was dubious, at best.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Edwards, 19 A.D.3d 170, 798 N.Y.S.2d 374 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

19 A.D.3d 170 (People v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Turner
47 Misc. 3d 100 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Rosado
53 A.D.3d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)