People v. Edwards

232 A.D.2d 342, 649 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11208
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J., at suppression hearing; Dorothy Cropper, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered on September 9, 1993, convicting defendant of robbery in the first and second degrees and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 121/2 to 25 years, 5 to 15 years, and 21/3 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

[343] The court’s exercise of discretion in providing an adverse inference instruction as a sanction for the lost pages in the officer’s memo book was appropriate and adequate (People v Haupt, 71 NY2d 929; People v Sandoz, 184 AD2d 336, Iv denied 80 NY2d 909). Since there is no reasonable probability that the verdict would have been different but for the loss of the evidence, reversal under Brady v Maryland (373 US 83) is unwarranted. Nor did the prosecutor impeach his own witness in violation of CPL 60.35 when he referred a witness with faulty recollection to a written statement without revealing its contents. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Edwards, 232 A.D.2d 342, 649 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 342 (People v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Abraham
29 A.D.3d 333 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Layman
284 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)