People v. Edwards
105 A.D.2d 1106, 482 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21201
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 A.D.2d 448 →
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no merit to defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (Strickland v Washington, 466 US _, 104 S Ct 2052; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147). We also find without merit defendant’s remaining claims of error. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J. — criminal sale of controlled substance, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and O’Donnell, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Edwards, 105 A.D.2d 1106, 482 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
105 A.D.2d 1106 (People v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)