People v. Edward T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Edward T.

82 A.D.2d 813

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.2d 813 (People v. Edward T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Edward T., 82 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), rendered January 21,1980, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, after his plea of guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of 30 days, with five years’ probation. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to five years’ probation. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5) and determination of further appropriate conditions of probation, if necessary. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J.P., Mangano, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), rendered January 21,1980, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, after his plea of guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of 30 days, with five years’ probation. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to five years’ probation. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5) and determination of further appropriate conditions of probation, if necessary. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J.P., Mangano, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-edward-t-nyappdiv-1981.