People v. Eckwerth

151 N.E.2d 351, 4 N.Y.2d 923
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Eckwerth. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 N.Y.2d 811
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1958·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States as follows: Appellant contended that his alleged confessions were coerced and that this coercion and his detention for an unreasonable time without arraignment, during which time the alleged confessions were taken, constituted denial to him of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that appellant was not denied due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. [See 4 N Y 2d 811.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Eckwerth, 151 N.E.2d 351, 4 N.Y.2d 923 (N.Y. 1958).

151 N.E.2d 351 (People v. Eckwerth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.