People v. Eastman

239 A.D.2d 276, 658 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5427
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 22, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander Hunter, J.), rendered April 24, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim concerning the prosecutor’s remarks during summation is unpreserved, since defendant offered only an unelaborated, one-word objection to the prosecutor’s comment [277] (see, People v Balls, 69 NY2d 641). In any event, the challenged portion of the prosecutor’s summation fairly commented on the evidence in response to defense arguments (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 109). Further, defendant’s contention that the arresting officer improperly testified that after defendant’s arrest, the undercover officer "did a drive-by ID”, was not preserved by his untimely mistrial motion (People v Gonzalez, 235 AD2d 225, lv denied 89 NY2d 985), and is, in any event, without merit. "This Court has repeatedly held that such testimony is not bolstering” (People v Hendricks, 223 AD2d 409, 410, lv denied 88 NY2d 966). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Eastman, 239 A.D.2d 276, 658 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

239 A.D.2d 276 (People v. Eastman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Woods
284 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Velasquez
254 A.D.2d 132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)