People v. Eastman

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Eastman

116 N.E.2d 494, 306 N.Y. 658, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 937

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 3, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 116 N.E.2d 494 (People v. Eastman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Eastman, 116 N.E.2d 494, 306 N.Y. 658, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 937 (N.Y. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order of the Appellate Division, as we read it, reversed the order of County Court insofar as it set aside the judgment of conviction and dismissed the information; it affirmed that order insofar as it remitted to the defendant the fine imposed upon him. The case is brought to this court upon appeal by the defendant. There was no cross appeal by the People.

While we have heretofore clearly indicated that the writ oí error coram nobis lies in courts not of record — such as a Court [660]*660of Special Sessions — nevertheless, in the situation now before us where the defect is made clear by the record, that remedy is not available (Matter of Hogan v. New York Supreme Court, 295 N. Y. 92, 96-97; Matter of Morhous v. New York Supreme Court, 293 N. Y. 131, 140).

Whether, in a case such as this, wherein the parties agree that the information was fatally defective and insufficient as a matter of law to support the conviction, some other remedy is open to defendant, we have no occasion at this time to consider.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Ftjld, Fboessel and Van Voobhis, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI