People v. East

52 A.D.3d 1248, 861 N.Y.S.2d 872
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Michael F. Pietruszka, J.), dated September 27, 2007. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of defendant’s omnibus motion seeking to suppress physical evidence.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the indictment is dismissed.

Memorandum: The People appeal from an order insofar as it granted that part of defendant’s omnibus motion seeking to suppress a weapon seized by the police from defendant’s vehicle. We affirm for the reasons stated in the decision at County Court. We agree with the court that the People failed to establish that the police had the requisite reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s vehicle, and thus the weapon was properly suppressed as the fruit of the illegal stop of defendant’s vehicle (see People v Brooks, 266 AD2d 864 [1999]). Present—Martoche, J.P, Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. East, 52 A.D.3d 1248, 861 N.Y.S.2d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

52 A.D.3d 1248 (People v. East) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BALL, WILLIAM K., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Ball
132 A.D.3d 1286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)