People v. Earnest

45 Cal. 29
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1872
DocketNo. 3,439
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 Cal. 29 (People v. Earnest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Earnest, 45 Cal. 29 (Cal. 1872).

Opinion

By the Court:

The statute (Hitt,, Secs. 3918, 3919) requires that a copy of the order of the. Court for the summoning of a Grand Jury should be delivered to the Sheriff and that it shall be the duty of that officer to summon the Grand Jury “ upon the receipt of the order,” etc. In this case the only order delivered to the Sheriff was an order to summon twenty-four [30]*30persons to serve as trial jurors. This trial jury was subsequently impaneled by the Court as a Grand Jury and found the indictment upon which the prisoner was convicted, and his motion to set aside the indictment, duly made on that ground, was denied. Had a subpoena been issued to summon twenty-four witnesses in the case there would have been just as much authority in the Court to impanel them as a Grand Jury as to impanel this trial jury as a Grand Jury.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to set aside the indictment and-for such further proceedings as may be proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Gannon
11 P. 240 (California Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Cal. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-earnest-cal-1872.