People v. Earnest

45 Cal. 29
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1872·No. No. 3,439·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The statute (Hitt,, Secs. 3918, 3919) requires that a copy of the order of the. Court for the summoning of a Grand Jury should be delivered to the Sheriff and that it shall be the duty of that officer to summon the Grand Jury “ upon the receipt of the order,” etc. In this case the only order delivered to the Sheriff was an order to summon twenty-four [30] persons to serve as trial jurors. This trial jury was subsequently impaneled by the Court as a Grand Jury and found the indictment upon which the prisoner was convicted, and his motion to set aside the indictment, duly made on that ground, was denied. Had a subpoena been issued to summon twenty-four witnesses in the case there would have been just as much authority in the Court to impanel them as a Grand Jury as to impanel this trial jury as a Grand Jury.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to set aside the indictment and-for such further proceedings as may be proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Earnest, 45 Cal. 29 (Cal. 1872).

45 Cal. 29 (People v. Earnest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Gannon
11 P. 240 (California Supreme Court, 1886)