People v. Early

199 A.D.2d 1069, 608 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12715
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Early. Read the opinion of the Court — 173 A.D.2d 884

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, defendant did not waive his right to request this Court, on appeal, to adjudicate him a youthful offender. Upon our consideration of the factors relevant on an application for youthful offender treatment (see, People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 334, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625), we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to vacate the conviction and adjudicate defendant [1070]*1070a youthful offender (see, People v Hanno, 197 AD2d 879; cf., People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Early, 199 A.D.2d 1069, 608 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 1069 (People v. Early) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dawn Maria C.
490 N.E.2d 530 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Cruickshank
105 A.D.2d 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Shrubsall
167 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Hanno
197 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)