People v. Earket
This text of 256 A.D.2d 1194 (People v. Earket) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently enter that plea (see, People v Sparrow, 222 AD2d 1114, lv denied 87 NY2d 977). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J.— Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D.2d 1194, 683 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-earket-nyappdiv-1998.