People v. Earket

256 A.D.2d 1194, 683 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14348
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently enter that plea (see, People v Sparrow, 222 AD2d 1114, lv denied 87 NY2d 977). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J.— Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Earket, 256 A.D.2d 1194, 683 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 1194 (People v. Earket) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snitzel v. Murry
371 F. Supp. 2d 295 (W.D. New York, 2004)
People v. Snitzel
270 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)