People v. Dykes

68 A.D.3d 1779, 890 N.Y.2d 855

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). “Great deference is accorded to the jury’s resolution of credibility issues . . . , and it cannot be said herein that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” (People v McKinnon, 15 AD3d 842, 842 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 888 [2005]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.E, Fahey, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dykes, 68 A.D.3d 1779, 890 N.Y.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 1779 (People v. Dykes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. McKinnon
15 A.D.3d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)