People v. Dyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dyer

259 A.D.2d 494, 684 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1998

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 494 (People v. Dyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dyer, 259 A.D.2d 494, 684 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1998 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered October 18, 1996, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the prosecution’s failure to provide Rosario material warrants reversal has not been properly preserved for appellate review. In any event, the inadequacy of the record forecloses any intelligent review of the defendant’s claim (see, People v Rashid, 164 AD2d 951).

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered October 18, 1996, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the prosecution’s failure to provide Rosario material warrants reversal has not been properly preserved for appellate review. In any event, the inadequacy of the record forecloses any intelligent review of the defendant’s claim (see, People v Rashid, 164 AD2d 951).

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 494, 684 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dyer-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack