People v. Dury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dury

179 A.D.2d 821

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 821 (People v. Dury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dury, 179 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial under Indictment No. 1229/87 (see, CPL 30.20; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). The People have indicated that the delay was caused by court congestion. In light of the facts that there was no extended period of pretrial incarceration and that there is no indication in the record that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay, we see no basis to dismiss the indictment (see, People v Watts, 57 NY2d 299). Bracken, J. P., Harwood, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial under Indictment No. 1229/87 (see, CPL 30.20; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). The People have indicated that the delay was caused by court congestion. In light of the facts that there was no extended period of pretrial incarceration and that there is no indication in the record that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay, we see no basis to dismiss the indictment (see, People v Watts, 57 NY2d 299). Bracken, J. P., Harwood, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.D.2d 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dury-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack