People v. Durham

30 A.D.3d 331, 816 N.Y.S.2d 684

This text of 30 A.D.3d 331 (People v. Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Durham, 30 A.D.3d 331, 816 N.Y.S.2d 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered January 27, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

The arguments raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief are without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. . Gaimari
68 N.E. 112 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 331, 816 N.Y.S.2d 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-durham-nyappdiv-2006.