People v. Durham

278 A.D.2d 335, 718 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12960

This text of 278 A.D.2d 335 (People v. Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Durham, 278 A.D.2d 335, 718 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered November 14, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The alleged errors claimed by the defendant are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or were cured by the trial court’s prompt instructions to the jury.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 335, 718 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-durham-nyappdiv-2000.