People v. Durham

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Durham

180 N.W.2d 290, 24 Mich. App. 358, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1721

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 3, 1970

DocketDocket No. 8,490

StatusPublished

This text of 180 N.W.2d 290 (People v. Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Durham, 180 N.W.2d 290, 24 Mich. App. 358, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1721 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By his plea of guilty, defendant was convicted of attempted sale of a narcotic drug in violation of MCLA § 335.152 (Stat Arm 1957 Rev § 18.1122) and MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287). He appealed as of right. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction. GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

On appeal, defendant contends that the lower court failed to examine him sufficiently to establish the [359]*359crime and his participation therein. See People v. Barrows (1959), 358 Mich 267, 272 and People v. Perine (1967), 7 Mich App 292.

Our review of the record satisfies us that the court’s examination of defendant was sufficient.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI