People v. Duquin

212 A.D.2d 1059, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2003
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously .affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to controvert the allegations in the second felony offender statement filed by the People pursuant to CPL 400.21 at the time of sentencing, defendant failed to preserve for review his contention that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender (see, People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961; People v Gessner, 188 AD2d [1060]*10601079, Iv denied 81 NY2d 1073). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J.—Attempted Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Duquin, 212 A.D.2d 1059, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 1059 (People v. Duquin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Anderson
35 A.D.3d 1209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)