People v. Dunwoody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dunwoody

202 A.D.2d 977, 609 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3335

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 202 A.D.2d 977 (People v. Dunwoody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dunwoody, 202 A.D.2d 977, 609 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and one count of criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree. He contends that the evidence was not sufficient to corroborate the testimony of the accomplices. We disagree. Defendant was seen by police officers throwing items from a window. Those items were retrieved by police immediately and contained cocaine. Defendant also was seen by police officers in the same room with 14 bags of cocaine and several bottles of dilutant. That evidence connected defendant with the crimes "in such a way that the jury may be reasonably satisfied that the accomplice is telling the truth” (People v Daniels, 37 NY2d 624, 630). Defendant also contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. There was testimony from the police chemist, however, that the total weight of the bags seized from inside the apartment and the bags thrown from the window was greater than the amount prescribed by statute.

Defendant’s sentence is not harsh or excessive. The other contentions raised by defendant have not been preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and one count of criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree. He contends that the evidence was not sufficient to corroborate the testimony of the accomplices. We disagree. Defendant was seen by police officers throwing items from a window. Those items were retrieved by police immediately and contained cocaine. Defendant also was seen by police officers in the same room with 14 bags of cocaine and several bottles of dilutant. That evidence connected defendant with the crimes "in such a way that the jury may be reasonably satisfied that the accomplice is telling the truth” (People v Daniels, 37 NY2d 624, 630). Defendant also contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. There was testimony from the police chemist, however, that the total weight of the bags seized from inside the apartment and the bags thrown from the window was greater than the amount prescribed by statute.

Defendant’s sentence is not harsh or excessive. The other contentions raised by defendant have not been preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 977, 609 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dunwoody-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack