People v. Dunston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dunston

130 A.D.3d 1061, 13 N.Y.S.3d 834

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Dunston. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 A.D.3d 769 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 29, 2015·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 14, 2012 (People v Dunston, 100 AD3d 769 [2012]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 2, 2011.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, [1062]*1062463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, J.P., Austin, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 14, 2012 (People v Dunston, 100 AD3d 769 [2012]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 2, 2011.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, [1062]*1062463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, J.P., Austin, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

People v. Dunston, 130 A.D.3d 1061, 13 N.Y.S.3d 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

130 A.D.3d 1061 (People v. Dunston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related