People v. Dunston
348 N.E.2d 618, 38 N.Y.2d 986, 384 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2618
Opinion
Renewed motion for an extension of time within which to serve and file a notice of appeal pursuant to CPL 460.10 (subd 5, par [b]) denied. It does not appear from the present submission that there exists either a "persisting” or "substantial” ground for review on the merits, the showing of both of which is required in order to prevail on the present motion. (People v Sher, 35 NY2d 310, 311.) It is not sufficient that leave to appeal was previously granted in this particular case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Dunston, 348 N.E.2d 618, 38 N.Y.2d 986, 384 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2618 (N.Y. 1976).
348 N.E.2d 618 (People v. Dunston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Sher
319 N.E.2d 419 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)