People v. Dunning
This text of 13 Cal. App. 300 (People v. Dunning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of the crime of lewd -and lascivious conduct with a child, as provided in section 288 of the Penal Code, and he appealed from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
No brief has been filed by appellant and no appearance was' made on his behalf when the cause was called for oral argument. The record, however, has been carefully examined and we find that the evidence abundantly supports the verdict, the instructions fully and accurately presented the questions of law involved and no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of appellant appears to have been committed. The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.
Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Cal. App. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dunning-calctapp-1910.