People v. Dunn

306 A.D.2d 945, 761 N.Y.S.2d 918, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6898
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga County Court (Walsh, J.), entered June 4, 2002, which revoked defendant’s probation and sentenced defendant to a determinate term of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the determinate term of imprisonment to three years and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to a determinate term of imprisonment. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record supports County Court’s finding that he violated the conditions of his probation (see CPL 410.70 [1]). Although we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking his probation on that ground (see People v Costanza, 281 AD2d 120, 125 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 827 [2001]), we modify the judgment as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the determinate term of imprisonment to three years (see 470.15 [6] [b]). Present — Wisner, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dunn, 306 A.D.2d 945, 761 N.Y.S.2d 918, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

306 A.D.2d 945 (People v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Patel
64 A.D.3d 1246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)