People v. Dunn

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Dunn

4 N.Y.2d 746, 171 N.Y.S.2d 864

DecidedFebruary 20, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.Y.2d 746 (People v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dunn, 4 N.Y.2d 746, 171 N.Y.S.2d 864 (N.Y. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Burke. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the information upon the ground that the article sold on Sunday was a useless knictimack which, in common parlance, amounted to a souvenir which is within the class of excepted articles permitted to be sold on that day by section 2147 of the Penal Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Burke. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the information upon the ground that the article sold on Sunday was a useless knictimack which, in common parlance, amounted to a souvenir which is within the class of excepted articles permitted to be sold on that day by section 2147 of the Penal Law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 N.Y.2d 746, 171 N.Y.S.2d 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dunn-ny-1958.