People v. Dunleavy
166 Cal. 779
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 30, 1913
DocketCrim. No. 1784a; Crim. No. 1784b; Crim. No. 1784c; Crim. No. 1784d
StatusPublished
This text of 166 Cal. 779 (People v. Dunleavy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Dunleavy, 166 Cal. 779 (Cal. 1913).
Opinion
Each of the appeals in the above entitled causes presents the same questions that are presented in People v. Plath, (Crim. No. 1784), ante, p. 227, [135 Pac. 954.] Upon the authority of the last named case, the action of the trial court in each of the above entitled eases must be affirmed.
The judgments appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Plath
135 P. 954 (California Supreme Court, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 Cal. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dunleavy-cal-1913.