People v. Dunlavey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dunlavey

171 A.D.2d 1037, 579 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6761

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D.2d 1037 (People v. Dunlavey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dunlavey, 171 A.D.2d 1037, 579 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495), defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147), and his sentence is not excessive. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting defense counsel’s direct examination of Linda MacBeth because her proposed testimony was not relevant. Defendant’s constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 445). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495), defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147), and his sentence is not excessive. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting defense counsel’s direct examination of Linda MacBeth because her proposed testimony was not relevant. Defendant’s constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 445). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D.2d 1037, 579 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dunlavey-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack