People v. Dunbar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dunbar

167 A.D.2d 481, 562 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14026

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D.2d 481 (People v. Dunbar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dunbar, 167 A.D.2d 481, 562 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14026 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (King, J.), rendered June 1, 1988, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that his plea allocution was insufficient is without merit. There was an extremely detailed plea allocution which amply satisfied the requirements of People v Harris (61 NY2d 9). The defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is without merit (see, People v Modica, 64 NY2d 828; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v McZorn, 121 AD2d 473). The record reflects that the defendant was amply apprised of his rights and the consequences of his plea and manifested an understanding of the nature and consequences of that plea.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (King, J.), rendered June 1, 1988, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that his plea allocution was insufficient is without merit. There was an extremely detailed plea allocution which amply satisfied the requirements of People v Harris (61 NY2d 9). The defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is without merit (see, People v Modica, 64 NY2d 828; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v McZorn, 121 AD2d 473). The record reflects that the defendant was amply apprised of his rights and the consequences of his plea and manifested an understanding of the nature and consequences of that plea.

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D.2d 481, 562 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dunbar-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack