People v. Duffy
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the defendant’s constitutional rights were violated by the prosecutor’s cross-examination concerning the particulars of his previous drug use and possession. The Court of Appeals considered that [858]*858contention and found no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 36 NY2d 258.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
331 N.E.2d 695 (People v. Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.