People v. Dudley
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4856 (People v. Dudley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the de *879 fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Holder, J.), rendered October 6, 2014, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that he was deprived of a fair trial due to improper remarks made by the trial court to prospective jurors during voir dire (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Cunningham, 119 AD3d 601 [2014]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court’s alleged misconduct did not constitute a mode of proceedings error exempting him from the rules of preservation (see People v Brown, 7 NY3d 880, 881 [2006]; People v Cunningham, 119 AD3d at 601-602; People v Casanova, 62 AD3d 88, 91-92 [2009]; People v McDuffie, 270 AD2d 362 [2000]). In any event, the court’s remarks to the prospective jurors, while inappropriate, did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see People v Mason, 132 AD3d 777, 779 [2015]; People v Daniel, 37 AD3d 731, 732 [2007]; People v Alston, 225 AD2d 453, 454 [1996]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 4856, 151 A.D.3d 878, 54 N.Y.S.3d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dudley-nyappdiv-2017.