People v. Duddles
This text of 706 N.W.2d 728 (People v. Duddles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kevin Ray DUDDLES, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY J., dissents and states as follows:
I would remand this case for resentencing. The judge departed from a guidelines *729 maximum of 15 months and sentenced defendant to 15 years in prison. I believe that this is unreasonable under People v. Babcock, 469 Mich. 247, 666 N.W.2d 231 (2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 N.W.2d 728, 474 Mich. 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-duddles-mich-2005.