People v. Duchesne

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Duchesne

727 N.E.2d 1249, 94 N.Y.2d 892, 706 N.Y.S.2d 695, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 84

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 29, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 727 N.E.2d 1249 (People v. Duchesne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Duchesne, 727 N.E.2d 1249, 94 N.Y.2d 892, 706 N.Y.S.2d 695, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 84 (N.Y. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The record does not support defendant’s assertion that the hearing court abused its discretion in balancing the applicable factors in conducting the Sandoval hearing in defendant’s second trial. Defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI