People v. Duchesne
727 N.E.2d 1249, 94 N.Y.2d 892, 706 N.Y.S.2d 695, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 84
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The record does not support defendant’s assertion that the hearing court abused its discretion in balancing the applicable factors in conducting the Sandoval hearing in defendant’s second trial. Defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Duchesne, 727 N.E.2d 1249, 94 N.Y.2d 892, 706 N.Y.S.2d 695, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 84 (N.Y. 2000).
727 N.E.2d 1249 (People v. Duchesne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The People v. Phillip Couser
68 N.E.3d 26 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
People v. Andino
291 A.D.2d 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)