People v. Dubose

2020 NY Slip Op 3126, 184 A.D.3d 584, 123 N.Y.S.3d 530
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 2020
DocketInd. No. 18-00608
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 3126 (People v. Dubose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dubose, 2020 NY Slip Op 3126, 184 A.D.3d 584, 123 N.Y.S.3d 530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Dubose (2020 NY Slip Op 03126)
People v Dubose
2020 NY Slip Op 03126
Decided on June 3, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 3, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2019-04331
(Ind. No. 18-00608)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Anthony Dubose, appellant.


Walter J. Storey, Goshen, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Robert H. Middlemiss of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Craig Stephen Brown, J.), imposed March 7, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the record does not reflect that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257). The County Court's colloquy did not ensure that the defendant understood the distinction between the right to appeal and the other trial rights which are forfeited incident to a plea of guilty (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257; People v Portillo, 178 AD3d 860; People v Batista, 167 AD3d 69, 76). Also, the court's colloquy suggested that the appellate rights waived encompassed an absolute bar to the taking of a direct appeal and the loss of attendant rights to counsel and poor person relief (see People v Thomas, __ NY3d __, 2019 NY Slip Op 08545, *8).

Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Tejada
2021 NY Slip Op 00883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Patterson
2020 NY Slip Op 06290 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Corley
2020 NY Slip Op 04851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 3126, 184 A.D.3d 584, 123 N.Y.S.3d 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dubose-nyappdiv-2020.