People v. Drangsland

92 A.D.2d 873, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17251

This text of 92 A.D.2d 873 (People v. Drangsland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Drangsland, 92 A.D.2d 873, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Appeals by defendant from two amended judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), both rendered April 29, 1982, each convicting him of violation of probation, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Amended judgments affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on these appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Lazer and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.2d 873, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-drangsland-nyappdiv-1983.