People v. Drake
216 A.D.2d 968, 629 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Drake. Read the opinion of the Court — 205 A.D.2d 996 →
Opinion
Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that an expert witness improperly relied upon the Grand Jury minutes is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Drake, 216 A.D.2d 968, 629 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
216 A.D.2d 968 (People v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.