People v. Drake

148 A.D.2d 464, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Drake. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.2d 963

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), imposed October 7, 1987.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant, who was adjudicated a second felony offender, received the terms of incarceration which he was promised. The terms are the minimum legal terms (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [b]; [4] [b]; § 70.15 [1] [a], [b]). Under the circumstances, including the defendant’s lengthy criminal record, a lesser sentence is neither warranted in the interest of justice nor mandated by constitutional considerations (see, People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, cert denied 423 US 950; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Drake, 148 A.D.2d 464, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

148 A.D.2d 464 (People v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Broadie
332 N.E.2d 338 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)