People v. Dozier

115 A.D.3d 1001, 981 N.Y.S.2d 626
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 2014·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered December 4, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant was charged in a 14-count indictment with various crimes relating to, among other things, the sale and possession of cocaine and heroin. In satisfaction of the indictment, he pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. In accordance with the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant to 12 years in prison and five years of postrelease supervision on the sale count and a consecutive term of 6V2 years in prison and three years of postrelease supervision on the possession count. Defendant appeals.

Although defendant’s challenge to the voluntariness of his plea survives his waiver of the right to appeal, that claim is not preserved for our review because the record does not reveal that he made an appropriate postallocution motion (see People v Bonville, 104 AD3d 1024, 1024 [2013]). While a guilty plea does not forfeit review of the denial of a suppression motion (see CPL 710.70 [2]; People v Issac, 107 AD3d 1055, 1056 [2013]), such [1002]*1002review is foreclosed by defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Stone, 105 AD3d 1094, 1094-1095 [2013]). The valid appeal waiver also precludes defendant’s argument that the sentence was harsh and excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Schanz, 82 AD3d 1417, 1417 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 800 [2011]).

Lahtinen, J.E, Garry and Rose, JJ, concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dozier, 115 A.D.3d 1001, 981 N.Y.S.2d 626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

115 A.D.3d 1001 (People v. Dozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Oddy
144 A.D.3d 1322 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Blair
136 A.D.3d 1105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Clark
135 A.D.3d 1239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Burritt
127 A.D.3d 1433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Merrill
123 A.D.3d 1339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
PeoplevGuyette
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
PeoplevRasul
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Rasul
121 A.D.3d 1413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Guyette
121 A.D.3d 1430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
PeoplevSmith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Smith
121 A.D.3d 1131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)