People v. Dozier
This text of 74 A.D.3d 1808 (People v. Dozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered February 24, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts).
It is hereby Ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his guilty plea, of two counts of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea inasmuch as the record does not support his assertion that the plea was the product of coercion (see People v Jones, 71 AD3d 1573 [2010]; People v Spikes, 28 AD3d 1101, 1102 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 818 [2006]). Furthermore, the record “establishes] that the defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty,” and we thus reject defendant’s challenge to the validity of the waiver of the right to appeal (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). That valid waiver encompasses [1809]*1809defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence (see id.). Present—Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 A.D.3d 1808, 902 N.Y.S.2d 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dozier-nyappdiv-2010.