People v. Dozier

44 A.D.3d 403, 843 N.Y.S.2d 502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Dozier. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 A.D.3d 987

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J., on dismissal motions; Arlene R. Silverman, J., at pleas and sentence), rendered May 10, 2005, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of five years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

There is no merit to defendant’s claim that he was “denied the right to the assistance of counsel” with respect to the grand jury proceedings leading to his weapon possession indictment, and his alleged desire to testify with respect to that charge (see People v Wiggins, 89 NY2d 872, 873 [1996]). Defendant’s claims relating to his drug indictment are likewise without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Buckley and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dozier, 44 A.D.3d 403, 843 N.Y.S.2d 502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

44 A.D.3d 403 (People v. Dozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wiggins
675 N.E.2d 845 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)