People v. Dozier
228 A.D.2d 516, 643 N.Y.2d 1010, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6593
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Dozier. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 655 →
Opinion
To the extent that the defendant contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the plea proceeding under Indictment No. 306/95, his contention is without merit (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Moreover, the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Francabandera, 33 NY2d 429).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Dozier, 228 A.D.2d 516, 643 N.Y.2d 1010, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 516 (People v. Dozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Francabandera
310 N.E.2d 292 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)