People v. Dozier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dozier

109 A.D.2d 750, 486 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.2d 750 (People v. Dozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dozier, 109 A.D.2d 750, 486 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.), rendered August 31, 1982, which, upon his plea of guilty, adjudicated him to be in violation of a sentence of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree and, thereupon, sentenced him to a definite term of one year’s imprisonment.

Amended judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606.) Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.), rendered August 31, 1982, which, upon his plea of guilty, adjudicated him to be in violation of a sentence of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree and, thereupon, sentenced him to a definite term of one year’s imprisonment.

Amended judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606.) Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 750, 486 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dozier-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack