People v. Downing

2024 NY Slip Op 05807
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Downing. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 A.D.3d 704
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 2024·No. 2023-05271·Published

Opinion

People v Downing (2024 NY Slip Op 05807)
People v Downing
2024 NY Slip Op 05807
Decided on November 20, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 20, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
LARA J. GENOVESI
CARL J. LANDICINO, JJ.

2023-05271

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Robert Downing, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 70076/23)


James D. Licata, New City, NY (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E. Walsh II, District Attorney, New City, NY (Carrie A. Ciganek of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kevin F. Russo, J.), rendered April 7, 2023, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the County Court improperly imposed a greater sentence than it had promised is not preserved for appellate review, as he neither objected to the sentence on that ground nor moved to vacate his plea (see People v Martin, 151 AD3d 753, 753; People v Carrasquillo, 133 AD3d 774, 774). In any event, failure to appear on a scheduled sentencing date in violation of a plea agreement may constitute a basis to impose an enhanced sentence (see People v Figgins, 87 NY2d 840; People v Pereyra, 169 AD3d 719, 719; People v Diaz, 146 AD3d 803, 805). Under the particular circumstances of this case, the court providently exercised its discretion in enhancing the defendant's sentence (see People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702, 712).

The enhanced sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

DUFFY, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, GENOVESI and LANDICINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Downing, 2024 NY Slip Op 05807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

2024 NY Slip Op 05807 (People v. Downing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Figgins
661 N.E.2d 156 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Carrasquillo
133 A.D.3d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Diaz
2017 NY Slip Op 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Martin
2017 NY Slip Op 4466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Outley
80 N.Y.2d 702 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)