People v. Downing

197 A.D.2d 588, 604 N.Y.S.2d 752

This text of 197 A.D.2d 588 (People v. Downing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Downing, 197 A.D.2d 588, 604 N.Y.S.2d 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hurley, J.), rendered December 12, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claims, including his claim that his sentence was excessive, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. We note in passing that an identification witness’s prior inability to identify a defendant as the perpetrator goes to the weight and not to the admissibility of the evidence (see, People v Fuller, 185 AD2d 446, 449; People v Cruz, 167 AD2d 306). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cruz
167 A.D.2d 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Fuller
185 A.D.2d 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.D.2d 588, 604 N.Y.S.2d 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-downing-nyappdiv-1993.