People v. Downey

248 A.D.2d 632, 669 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2849
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Downey. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 A.D.2d 794

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.), rendered May 21, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 7V2 to 15 years imprisonment.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of 5 to 10 years imprisonment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant was provided with meaningful representation of counsel (see, People v Ellis, 81 NY2d 854; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

The defendant’s sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not require reversal.

O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Downey, 248 A.D.2d 632, 669 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 632 (People v. Downey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Ellis
613 N.E.2d 529 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)