People v. Downey
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.), rendered May 21, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 7V2 to 15 years imprisonment.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of 5 to 10 years imprisonment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant was provided with meaningful representation of counsel (see, People v Ellis, 81 NY2d 854; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).
The defendant’s sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not require reversal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
248 A.D.2d 632 (People v. Downey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.