People v. Dowling

344 N.E.2d 57, 38 N.Y.2d 771, 381 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2374
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 4, 1975·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted to the extent of revising the memorandum of the Court of Appeals by inserting the words "and whether the lower court denied the motion addressed to the indictment on its merits or refused to entertain it, its disposition of the application was entirely within its discretion (CPL 210.20, subd 2)” in place of the words "and so the lower courts acted within their discretion in refusing to consider it (CPL 210.20, subd 2)”; motion otherwise denied. [See 37 NY2d 913.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dowling, 344 N.E.2d 57, 38 N.Y.2d 771, 381 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2374 (N.Y. 1975).

344 N.E.2d 57 (People v. Dowling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Parron (Commissioner of Labor)
2018 NY Slip Op 1696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
In re the Claims Falco-Ward
129 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Saunders v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n
526 S.W.2d 515 (Texas Supreme Court, 1975)