People v. Dowdell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dowdell

111 A.D.2d 182

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Dowdell. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 A.D.2d 239 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 6, 1985·Published

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered October 1,1982, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

[183]*183We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered October 1,1982, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

[183]*183We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

People v. Dowdell, 111 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

111 A.D.2d 182 (People v. Dowdell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related